PHP to Node.js migration is the planned, step-by-step move of a PHP application (WordPress, Laravel, Drupal, Magento or custom code) onto Node.js with React or Next.js, or onto Java (Spring Boot) with a React front end. After the PHP2Shell flaws, the NSA and CISA tell organizations to patch PHP immediately, so patching or vendor guidance comes first and migration is the longer project. MIS Services runs a free 30-minute PHP architecture and migration assessment: book it here or see our application development work.
Status as of October 22, 2026, 7:05 AM ET (11:05 UTC)
We re-read each primary source here at the time shown. Check the primary sources for the latest before you act.
- What it is: two flaws in the PHP interpreter itself, CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619, each rated 9.2 (Critical) on CVSS v4.0. Both can allow unauthenticated remote code execution with the web server account's privileges (Sophos advisory, version 3, updated October 22).
- Fixed releases, published October 21, 2026: PHP 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36 and 8.2.35 (php.net advisory). They are not installed automatically; hosts, Linux distributions and appliance vendors ship their own packages, and PHP says no interim mitigation is complete.
- PHP 8.1 and older: no official release, only source-only backports for 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1. Sophos and CERT-EU both say to move to a supported branch.
- Agencies: the NSA and CISA urge immediate patching and say to take PHP systems offline if they cannot be updated right away.
- Exploitation: sources differ; a comparison follows. Sophos cites an attempt on October 17, before disclosure, while CISA said at publication that it had not observed exploitation.
- Latest: NOS reported on October 22 that Dutch government sites taken offline as a precaution were back online, and that the Dutch data protection authority knew of no confirmed data leaks so far.
What Happened and What Do the Agencies Actually Say?
PHP2Shell is the nickname for two memory-safety flaws in the PHP interpreter, the engine that runs PHP code on a web server. They are not bugs in WordPress, Laravel or your own code. The NSA's press release calls them "flaws in PHP itself, not in the hosted application or its configuration," which is why the fix is a PHP runtime update, not an application update.
In the advisories' terms, CVE-2026-109618 comes from how PHP exits a request when it runs out of memory, leaving partly initialized data that cleanup treats as valid. CVE-2026-109619 concerns internal state that outlives the memory behind it, so a later request on the same worker can use stale data. Sansec reports that the vulnerable code dates to PHP 5.4.0 and that CVE-2026-109618 can also leak memory, which may expose passwords, session tokens, API keys and TLS private keys.
Timeline, as reported
- August 1, 2026: Calif researchers begin finding remote-code-execution paths (Sansec, Calif). A first report reaches the PHP project on August 11, and Wiz Research reports separately on August 24 (Sansec).
- October 20: details leak before the planned disclosure (Sansec), and PHP posts advance notice of a security release (php.net).
- October 21: PHP releases the fixed versions at about 14:00 UTC (CERT-EU says 13:30). CVE records and agency guidance follow the same day.
What the agencies and advisories say
| Source | What it says |
|---|---|
| NSA, Oct. 21 | Inventory PHP-dependent systems and apply vendor patches; consider more logging and replacing end-of-life PHP services that cannot be patched. If an immediate update is not feasible, take the system offline until fully mitigated. |
| CISA, Oct. 21 | Update to the fixed versions, internet-facing systems first. If you cannot update right away, or still run PHP 8.1 or earlier, take PHP systems offline until patched or updated. A WAF may offer some protection meanwhile. |
| FBI, via AP, Oct. 21 | AP reports the FBI's cyber division warned of remote code execution risk and recommended taking websites offline if they cannot be updated immediately. |
| UK NCSC, Oct. 21 | Find all PHP installations, update, apply the PHP Foundation's temporary mitigations if you cannot, consider going offline if mitigations cannot be applied, and check for compromise. |
| CERT-EU, Oct. 21 | Patch immediately. If that is not feasible, isolate internet-facing resources until the fix is applied and verified. For end-of-life versions, use a vendor backport or upgrade. |
| Sophos, Oct. 22 | Update, upgrade anything on 8.1 or earlier, review logs from August 1, 2026, and treat interim mitigations as exposure reduction only. |
Is it being exploited right now?
| Source | Statement |
|---|---|
| Sophos, Oct. 22 | Amazon Threat Intelligence reported an attempt on October 17, before disclosure; other vendors report more since. |
| CISA, Oct. 21 | Had not observed exploitation as of publication. |
| CERT-EU, Oct. 21 | Proofs of concept are circulating, so attackers are more likely already exploiting. |
| Sansec, Oct. 21 | Cloudflare reported early attacks at 07:43 UTC on October 21; Sansec expects mass exploitation. |
| watchTowr, Oct. 21 | Reports active exploitation attempts; describes attempts, not confirmed compromises. |
| NOS, Oct. 22 | The Dutch data protection authority knew of no confirmed leaks or thefts of data yet. |
Read together: attempts are reported, and the primary sources we read do not document a confirmed compromise of a named site. That is a reason to patch promptly and calmly, not to assume your site is compromised, and we make no claim to detect attacks. Scale is part of the concern: W3Techs reports PHP on 69.3% of websites with a known server-side language (October 22, 2026).
What Should You Do This Week, Before Any Migration?
Migration is a long strategic project, not a substitute for patching. The first action is always to get onto a fixed PHP release or follow your vendor's guidance.
- Inventory every PHP runtime. Sophos says to use runtime evidence, not asset records: look for processes named php, php-fpm and php-cgi, plus versioned variants such as php8.3, and confirm the version from the binary. CISA notes PHP is often a component of other software, so prevalence may be hard to see; NCSC-NL's repository lists products that embed PHP.
- Update to a fixed release or your vendor's equivalent: 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36 or 8.2.35. Linux distributions and long-term-support vendors received patches in advance, so ask them. The PHP project notes the volunteer-run Remi repository had no update on release day.
- Restart workers and verify from a live request. Sophos advises restarting all PHP workers and checking effective settings through a live web request, such as phpinfo(), not command-line PHP.
- If you cannot update today, reduce exposure. Take internet-facing PHP offline or behind network-layer authentication (Sophos), or isolate it (CERT-EU). Otherwise apply the interim measures below and treat the system as exposed.
- If you run PHP 8.1 or older, decide quickly. CISA says to take such systems offline until patched or updated. Options: a vendor backport, the PHP team's source-only backports, an upgrade to a supported branch, or re-platforming; the next section helps you choose.
- Review logs from August 1, 2026. Sophos lists multipart/form-data POSTs to endpoints that take no uploads, requests containing the PHP_SESSION_UPLOAD_PROGRESS field, memory-exhaustion spikes or worker crashes, unexpected child processes, new or modified PHP files in web roots, and odd outbound connections. Many logs omit request bodies, so check WAF logs. If you find signs of compromise, preserve logs and call an incident-response provider.
- Ask every third party whose appliances or hosted services bundle PHP to confirm patch status (Sophos, UK NCSC).
Interim mitigations, with their sources
These reduce exposure to specific attack paths only. The PHP project says "updating is the only safe choice." Restart every PHP worker after any change.
| Measure | Details and caveats | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Offline or restricted access | Take internet-facing PHP applications offline or behind network-layer authentication such as ZTNA. | Sophos; NSA; CISA |
| memory_limit=-1, set where apps cannot override it | Use php_admin_value in the FPM pool or Apache configuration. PHP says an allocation failure can still reach the vulnerable path, and Sansec warns one request can then use all memory, so add a container or cgroup limit and restore the limit after patching. | PHP advisory; Sansec |
| Low post_max_size and request limits | 8M if there are no uploads, 32M if there are, with upload_max_filesize below it. Also limit decoded request size, field, part and header counts, and nesting depth at the web server or proxy. | PHP advisory; CERT-EU |
| Container or cgroup memory limit | Use as an availability boundary. Avoid RLIMIT_AS and RLIMIT_DATA, which can trigger the vulnerable allocation failure. | PHP advisory |
| session.upload_progress.enabled=0 | Set in php.ini, the FPM pool or server configuration, not ini_set() or .user.ini, then restart every worker. Blocks the confirmed session paths, not other variants. | PHP advisory; CERT-EU |
| fatal_error_backtraces=0 (PHP 8.5 only) | Blocks only the confirmed fatal-backtrace path. Restart every worker. | PHP advisory |
| Reject multipart/form-data, or switch uploads off | If the application takes no uploads, reject multipart/form-data at the web server or WAF, or set file_uploads = Off. This breaks uploads, so test checkout and forms. | Sophos; Sansec |
On firewalls, sources differ in emphasis. CISA says a WAF may provide some protection until systems are patched. Sophos cautions that in-process protections such as RASP or embedded WAF agents may not stop an attack on Apache mod_php, where an unauthenticated request can trigger the flaw before application code runs.
Should You Migrate or Upgrade PHP?
What a migration is, and what it is not
A PHP to Node.js migration re-implements an application's behavior on a new runtime, usually Node.js with React or Next.js, while keeping URLs, data and integrations working. The Java alternative does the same on Spring Boot. It is a strategic project, not a patch, and nothing here should delay the update described above.
It also does not remove risk; it changes the risk profile. On the day PHP shipped its fixes, the Node.js project published security releases covering 10 vulnerabilities, 4 of them high severity, including a Brotli decoder flaw that could permit remote code execution. The Spring security page lists advisories dated August 20, 2026, including high-severity entries for Spring Security. Nor do we say PHP is dead.
The honest case for migrating
- Unsupported PHP. php.net lists PHP 8.1 as end of life since December 31, 2025, 8.0 since November 26, 2023 and 7.4 since November 28, 2022. The NSA's release specifically mentions replacing end-of-life PHP services that cannot be patched. W3Techs (October 22, 2026) shows PHP 7 on 26.9% and PHP 5 on 7.7% of PHP-using sites.
- A short runway on 8.2. php.net lists PHP 8.2 security support ending December 31, 2026, so 8.2.35 is a stopgap.
- Unmaintained frameworks and plugins. Patching PHP does not repair abandoned code. Laravel's support table shows Laravel 10 security fixes ended February 4, 2025, and Laravel 13 requires PHP 8.3 or newer.
- Strategic fit. A JavaScript or TypeScript team, or one that already runs Java, can have a real reason to consolidate once the assessment confirms the business case.
When not to migrate
- Your application runs on a supported PHP branch, is patched, and your team can maintain it.
- The only problem is an old PHP version in otherwise sound code. Upgrading within PHP, using the php.net migration guides, is usually the smaller project.
- A small brochure site or store can often be rebuilt on our published one-time website design packages, from $399, instead of being migrated piece by piece.
- There is no test coverage, no owner and no business reason.
| Your situation | Usually the better first move | Why |
|---|---|---|
| PHP 8.3 to 8.5, supported framework and plugins | Patch to the fixed release; keep a routine upgrade cadence | A fix exists and the application need not change. |
| PHP 8.2 | Patch to 8.2.35 now; plan the move to 8.3 or newer before December 31, 2026 | php.net lists 8.2 security support ending that day. |
| PHP 8.1 | Vendor backport or upgrade to a supported branch now; compare re-platforming | No official release exists; CISA says offline until patched or updated. |
| PHP 7.4 or older | Compare a multi-version upgrade with incremental migration | Several generations of breaking changes may sit between you and a supported branch. |
| Unmaintained framework, CMS or plugins | Incremental migration of the affected modules | Updating PHP does not repair code nobody maintains. |
| Team wants a JavaScript or Java stack | Incremental migration behind a gateway | Business case, hiring and tooling drive this, not one advisory. |
| WordPress with no custom application logic | Update PHP at the host first; see our WordPress team only for a business reason to rebuild | WordPress.org says no core or plugin update is needed and recommends PHP 8.3 or greater. |
Our PHP Migration and Modernization Services
Six workstreams, scoped together after the free assessment. See our web development services for the wider picture.
Inventory and Risk Assessment
A written inventory of PHP runtimes, frameworks, databases and integrations, ranked by exposure, ending in a recommendation: patch and upgrade, migrate incrementally, or rebuild.
Node.js and React or Next.js Migration
Route-by-route replacement of PHP pages and endpoints with a Node.js back end and React or Next.js front end, starting with one pilot module.
Java (Spring Boot) and React Migration
The same incremental approach with Spring Boot services behind a React front end, for organizations that already run Java.
Database and Data Migration
Schema review, staged data moves and consistency checks, so old and new code can share data during the transition.
SEO-Safe Cut-Over
URL mapping, server-side redirects, canonical tags, sitemaps and rendering checks, monitored in Search Console after launch.
Testing, Hardening and Decommissioning
Parity tests, a security review of the new stack, credential rotation, and a planned shutdown of the old PHP servers.
When Does a Node.js and React Migration Fit?
Node.js with React or Next.js fits best when the work is API-heavy, interface-heavy or real-time, and your team already writes JavaScript or TypeScript. One language across server and browser simplifies hiring and code sharing. Our own site is hand-coded in Next.js and server-rendered, and our application development page covers the web apps, portals and SaaS products we build on Next.js, React, Node and Postgres.
Rendering matters for search. Google's JavaScript SEO documentation says server-side rendering and pre-rendering remain recommended because they make sites faster for users and crawlers, and not every bot can run JavaScript. So we default to server-rendered pages for content that must rank.
| Area | In PHP | In Node.js | What we plan for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Process model | Pooled workers reused across requests, with request state reset between them | One long-running process serving many concurrent requests | Shared state, memory use, error handling and graceful restarts. |
| Sessions | Server-side sessions are common | Often tokens or an external session store | A session plan so users stay signed in where possible. |
| Deployment | Web server plus PHP runtime | Node process behind a reverse proxy | The proxy doubles as the cut-over gateway. |
Node.js has its own lifecycle. On the Node.js release schedule read on October 22, 2026, versions 24 and 22 are listed as LTS, 26 as Current and 20 as end-of-life, and the project advises production applications to use only LTS releases. The honest tradeoffs: there is no safe line-by-line conversion from PHP, so behavior is re-implemented and verified against the old system; and for a mostly-content site, a rebuild on a content platform may be simpler than custom Node.js.
When Does a Java (Spring Boot) and React Migration Fit?
Java with Spring Boot and a React front end fits organizations that already run Java services, want strict typing and mature enterprise integration, or maintain long-lived transactional systems where formal structure matters more than speed to a first release. We recommend a target only after seeing your code and your team.
The tradeoffs are real. A Spring Boot project usually carries more up-front structure than a small Node.js service, which can lengthen the path to a first module, and JVM applications need their own hosting and patch discipline. The Spring security page lists advisories dated August 20, 2026, and Spring publishes a support policy with a finite window for each release line.
| Question | Leans Node.js and React | Leans Java (Spring Boot) and React |
|---|---|---|
| Where is your engineering skill? | JavaScript or TypeScript developers | Java developers or an existing JVM estate |
| What does it integrate with? | Web APIs, SaaS services, a React front end | Existing Java services and enterprise systems |
| How much structure do you want? | Lighter, faster to a pilot | More formal layering and conventions |
Either way the migration is incremental: the PHP application keeps serving every route that has not moved. Unsure which row is you? The free assessment answers it.
Our Migration Method, Inventory to Decommission
Inventory and Map
We catalog every PHP runtime, route, scheduled job, database table, integration and public URL, then rank each by risk and business importance.
Strangler-Fig, Route by Route
A gateway or reverse proxy in front of the old application sends each request to the legacy code or the new service. We start with a pilot module and move routes as each is verified.
Refactor Data and Schema
Old and new code often share a database. We plan staged moves, consistency validation before cut-over, and a rollback path until legacy objects are removed.
Test, Harden, Decommission
We compare behavior with the legacy application, review security on the new stack, rotate credentials, then switch off the old PHP servers so nothing stays unpatched.
The pattern is described by Martin Fowler and in Microsoft's Azure Architecture Center; both favor small, reversible steps over a big-bang replacement. Talk to us about your system.
How Do You Migrate Without Losing Search Rankings?
A migration changes URLs, rendering and server behavior, and each can affect rankings if mishandled. Google's guide to site moves with URL changes says to expect temporary fluctuation in rankings during a move, and that the transition can take a few weeks or longer for a medium-sized site. The goal is to keep that fluctuation short and small; nobody can promise it away. MIS Services has been in business since 2014 and has worked with 375 clients, and we plan search visibility in from the start.
What Google's documentation tells us to do
- Map every old URL to a new one, compiled from sitemaps, server logs, analytics, Search Console and the CMS, including images, JavaScript and CSS, and stored in a database or rewrite rules.
- Use server-side permanent redirects. Google's redirect documentation prefers them; its site-move guide says permanent redirects do not cost PageRank, advises against sending many old URLs to one unrelated page such as the home page, and says to keep redirects generally for at least one year.
- Keep canonical signals consistent. Per Google's canonicalization guide, use the same canonical URL across redirects, rel=canonical and sitemaps, and keep the canonical tag in the HTML source where possible.
- Keep the new site crawlable. Google's JavaScript SEO basics say to use standard anchor links with an href, real URLs through the History API rather than fragments, and a plan for pages that should return a 404.
- Control staging and launch settings. For hosting moves, Google's guide advises testing on a noindex hostname, checking that firewalls do not block Googlebot, lowering DNS TTL a week ahead, and removing temporary blocks at launch. For URL changes, submit the new sitemap once the move starts and monitor both sites in Search Console.
| Risk | How it happens | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Lost URLs | Routes renamed without redirects | URL map, server-side 301 or 308 redirects, 404 or 410 for retired content |
| Staging rules left on | A noindex tag or robots rule copied to production | Launch checklist and URL Inspection tests |
| Unrendered content | Client-only rendering hides content or links | Server-rendered pages and crawlable links |
| Conflicting canonicals | Canonicals still point to old URLs | One canonical per page, matching redirects and sitemap |
| Blind spots after launch | Nobody watches old URLs or crawl errors | Search Console, Google Analytics 4 and log monitoring |
Our search engine optimization and website optimization teams work alongside the developers on every cut-over, and client sites we manage are listed on our SEO portfolio. Results vary, and we do not guarantee rankings.
Patch and Upgrade, Incremental Migration, or Full Rebuild?
All three are legitimate. The comparison is qualitative on purpose, because durations and costs depend on your application.
| Factor | Patch and upgrade PHP | Incremental migration | Full rebuild |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reduces today's exposure | Fastest, if a fix or vendor package exists | Not by itself; patch first | Not by itself; patch first |
| Time to complete | Shortest | Staged; value arrives route by route | One long build; value arrives at cut-over |
| Main cost driver | Testing; framework and plugin compatibility | Routes, integrations, data tables and the temporary gateway | Re-specifying behavior and testing everything |
| Delivery risk | Lowest | Moderate; each step is small and reversible | Highest; Fowler notes full rewrites often fail |
| SEO risk | Low; URLs stay the same | Moderate; managed route by route | Highest; every URL may change at once |
| Best for | Supported PHP with sound code | Large or critical apps, end-of-life PHP, teams moving to Node.js or Java | Small apps, or well-understood systems that rarely change |
Not sure which column you are in? The free assessment decides, in writing. Prefer to learn about us first? Read about MIS Services.
How Does an Engagement Work and What Do We Need From You?
Our process has five stages. We state no durations, team sizes or outcomes, because they depend on your application and we do not guarantee them.
- Free 30-minute assessment of what you run, what the advisories mean for it, and your constraints.
- Written inventory, risk ranking and recommendation: patch and upgrade, incremental migration, or rebuild.
- Pilot of one module or route to prove the approach, the tests and the cut-over mechanics.
- Incremental cut-over behind a gateway or reverse proxy, with redirects and SEO monitoring in place.
- Decommission of the legacy PHP servers, with credentials rotated and temporary routing removed.
What we need from you
- Your PHP applications and domains, and who hosts each one, including anything a vendor runs for you.
- PHP version, framework or CMS and version, and plugins, as far as you know them.
- Database type and rough size, plus every integration: payments, email, accounting, sign-in, shipping and APIs.
- Access to Google Search Console and Google Analytics 4, so we can see which URLs carry traffic and calls.
- Source repositories and a staging copy, shared through a secure channel. Please never email passwords.
- Your business-critical flows (checkout, booking), compliance duties, maintenance windows and a named decision-maker.
What we do not do: we migrate and harden applications and protect SEO during the move. We do not provide incident response and we do not claim to detect or stop attacks. If you see signs of compromise, preserve your logs and engage an incident-response provider.
Want the Details Behind These Decisions? Start Here
This page is the overview. Four companion guides go deeper on the questions people ask most, and each one points back here when migration is the right answer.
- PHP2Shell fix guide: am I affected, which PHP versions are fixed, and what to do in the next few hours.
- PHP end of life and upgrade guide: which PHP branches are still supported and how to move from 7.4, 8.0 or 8.1.
- PHP vs Node.js: a fair comparison of the two stacks, including Laravel, and how to decide.
- WordPress and the PHP vulnerability: what WordPress owners should do now, and when moving to Next.js makes sense.
Where the Facts on This Page Come From
Every fact here comes from a page we opened and read on October 22, 2026. Government and project sources come first; read them for updates, because this story is moving.
- NSA press release, Oct. 21, 2026 nsa.gov/Press-Room/Press-Releases-Statements/Press-Release-View/Articl — patching, end-of-life replacement, offline guidance
- CISA alert, Oct. 21, 2026 cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2026/10/21/critical-vulnerabilities-php-re — fixed versions, offline guidance
- php.net security advisory, Oct. 21, 2026 php.net/archive/2026.php#2026-10-21-5 — fixed versions, interim mitigations, backports
- Sophos advisory SA-20261021-php2shell, v3 sophos.com/en-us/security-advisories/sophos-sa-20261021-php2shell — exploitation reports, log indicators
- CERT-EU advisory 2026-018, v1.1 cert.europa.eu/publications/security-advisories/2026-018/ — versions, exploitation assessment
- UK NCSC alert ncsc.gov.uk/news/critical-security-issue-affecting-php — priority-ordered recommendations
- PHP Foundation blog, Oct. 21, 2026 thephp.foundation/blog/2026/10/21/todays-php-security-release-and-how- — release timing
- GitHub advisory GHSA-w8hw-w9fx-j79w github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-w8hw-w9fx-j79w — CVE-2026-109618, CVSS v4.0 9.2
- GitHub advisory GHSA-6wmf-4rv5-p3rp github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-6wmf-4rv5-p3rp — CVE-2026-109619, CVSS v4.0 9.2
- CVE record CVE-2026-109618 cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-109618
- CVE record CVE-2026-109619 cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-109619
- NCSC-NL php2shell repository github.com/NCSC-NL/php2shell — software that embeds PHP
- Sansec research sansec.io/research/php2shell — timeline, PHP 5.4.0 origin
- Calif write-up calif.io/php2shell
- watchTowr watchtowr.com/intelligence/php-remote-code-execution-php2shell/
- AP News apnews.com/article/php-websites-fbi-europe-vulnerability-a0af9576808a0 — FBI statement as reported
- NOS nos.nl/artikel/2636196-overheidspagina-s-weer-online-na-php-lek-vooral
- W3Techs PHP statistics, Oct. 22, 2026 w3techs.com/technologies/details/pl-php
- php.net supported versions php.net/supported-versions.php
- php.net unsupported branches php.net/eol.php
- WordPress.org: Critical PHP Security Release, Oct. 21, 2026 wordpress.org/news/2026/10/critical-php-security-release/ — no WordPress update required; update PHP
- WordPress.org requirements wordpress.org/about/requirements/
- Laravel support policy laravel.com/docs/13.x/releases
- Node.js release schedule nodejs.org/en/about/previous-releases
- Node.js security releases, Oct. 21, 2026 nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/october-2026-security-releases
- Spring security advisories spring.io/security
- Google: site moves with URL changes developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/site-move-with-url
- Google: site moves without URL changes developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/site-move-no-url-c
- Google: redirects developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/301-redirects
- Google: canonicalization developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/consolidate-duplic
- Google: JavaScript SEO basics developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/javascript/javascr
- Microsoft: Strangler Fig pattern learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/strangler-fig
- Martin Fowler: Strangler Fig Application martinfowler.com/bliki/StranglerFigApplication.html
Frequently Asked Questions
Get a Free PHP Architecture and Migration Assessment
Book 30 minutes with our team. We map what you run, what the NSA and CISA guidance means for it, and whether to patch, migrate step by step, or rebuild.
12 W Sunrise HWY, Lindenhurst, NY 11757 · Mon–Fri 9 AM – 6 PM ET
Talk to Us About Your PHP Application
Tell us what you run and where it is hosted. We reply on business days, Mon-Fri 9 AM-6 PM ET.